6 svar till “Carl Bildt – en hycklare?”

1. ”In a time of universal deceit – telling the truth is a revolutionary act” – George Orwell.

   ”Snowden svartlistad på UD:s internetkonferens”
   http://www.aftonbladet.se/kultur/article18948838.ab

   Snowden nu åter svartlistad på UD:
   ”For the last 18 years, the winners have been announced in the press room of the Foreign Department ” ”But when the Swedish foreign minister, Carl Bildt, received the information he refused to allow the prize to be announced in the foreign department’s building – despite a previous agreement.”
   http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-29347715

2. Skönt också att vi slipper se Bildt-kopian Urban Ahlin som utrikesminister, men risken finns att Margot Wallström träder fram ur kulisserna för att fortsätta att föra EU:s talan från en ny plattform. Inte bra.

3. Hur kommer det sig att Sverige ”begåvats” med Europas sämsta, mest odemokratiska politiker?

4. Per Gahrton skriver i Aftonbladet ”Carl Bildt – en politisk solochvårare
   Få lär sakna den fiffigt duperande ministern när han lämnat sin post.” Gahrton utvecklar sin kritik med olika exempel. (http://www.aftonbladet.se/kultur/article19619079.ab). Men varför har en skarp kritik i dominerande massmedia saknas av Carl Bildt, med enstaka undantag. Han har gjort stor skada för Sveriges anseende, med stödet till USA:s/NATO:s krig i Afghanistan, stödet för syriska ”rebeller”, motståndet mot ökade insatser för kärnvapennedrustning.

5. På tal om kupp i Ukraina:
   http://russia-insider.com/en/politics_ukraine_opinion_media_watch/2014/09/30/09-34-22pm/wests_ignorance_ukraine_atrocities

   The West’s Ignorance of Ukraine Atrocities is an Outrage

   Today, buried 9 minutes into the latest edition of the Channel 1 news report on Russian television, was a 23 seconds long statement by Latvian Human Rights investigator Enorst Gronych who declared on camera http://tv-novosti.ru/date/2014-09-29/1kanal/15-00?start=00-09-03&stop=00-09-23 that he has interviewed the people of a village recently evacuated by the Junta’s repression forces who had told him about ”repeated cases of gang rapes of minor girls aged 12, 13 and 14 years old” by Ukrainian thugs.

   According to Gronych, this kind of pattern falls within the definition of ”genocide”.

   In fact, the Russian TV channels have also been reporting mass graves, numerous cases of civilians pulled out of their cars and summarily shot, mass graves of people shot with their hands tied in their back and tortures, tortures and more tortures: systematic beatings, branding with swastikas, knife wounds, broken bones, heard trauma, damaged kidneys are all apparently what any detained person (regardless of the reason for their detention) should expect from the Junta’s ”liberators”.

   Furthermore, it is now becoming apparent that about 50% of the Novorussian ”prisoners of war” which are being exchanged for Ukrainian POWs under the terms of the recent ceasefire agreement are not combatants at all but civilians seized for the sole purpose of exchanging them.

   It is not hard to imagine what truly happened to the missing 50%: most of them were tortured and shot by drunken Ukrainian thugs (in stark contrast Ukrainian POWs were treated, washed, fed, clothed and then given the choice to say in Russia or go back to the Ukraine).

   For anybody familiar with Ukrainian nationalism and Ukrainian nationalists, this is hardly surprising. Not only is that fully consistent with what happens in the rest of the Junta-controlled Ukraine, it is also consistent with the practice of Ukrainian nationalists of the times of Bandera and before.

   No, what is amazing is the utter silence in the West about this. For somebody like me who vividly remembers the loud and indignant protests of western human rights NGOs, media and governments over human rights violations in Chechnia, Bosnia or Kosovo (including plenty of completely fictional ones!), it is amazing to see how ”for some mysterious reasons” the Ukrainian atrocities seem to go unnoticed in the West.

   The very same West who is absolutely outraged about the arrest of Pussy Riot activist and who seems to seriously believe that organizing a ”gay pride parade’ in Moscow is a human right is apparently totally indifferent to the gang rape of 12-14 year old girls.

   What does this say about the West, it’s values, it’s leaders, media and people?

6. Vi har fler propagandister man misstänker inte spelar med öppna kort:

   ”Rysk arrogans blir problem för Löfven
   Det finns något djupt sorgligt över Rysslands aggressiva uppträdande vid Östersjön just nu.
   Det hade inte behövt bli så.”
   https://www.aftonbladet.se/ledare/ledarkronika/anderslindberg/article19629284.ab

   ????????????????? Va?

   ”the United States and its European allies share most of the responsibility for the crisis. The taproot of the trouble is NATO enlargement, the central element of a larger strategy to move Ukraine out of Russia’s orbit and integrate it into the West.”
   http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/141769/john-j-mearsheimer/why-the-ukraine-crisis-is-the-wests-fault

   NATO’s reckless Russia‑baiting
   ”It’s not Russia’s delusions of empire that are the problem here; rather it’s the confusion of that Western remnant of US imperialism, NATO, that has helped foment the conflict in Ukraine. Ever expanding its membership eastwards towards the Russian border”
   http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/natos-reckless-russia-baiting/15792

   ”It’s time to back away from the Russian wolf
   Russia’s President Vladimir Putin won’t be thwarted by Nato or economic sanctions and his aim of a neutral Ukraine is acceptable ”
   http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/vladimir-putin/11084600/Its-time-to-back-away-from-the-Russian-wolf.html

   The US Conquest of Europe
   ”I believe the United States’ establishment is starting to feel a new sense of its relative decline in the world, and it is desperate to shore things up by hurting new competitors. The so-called pivot towards China is one of its tactics, and the expansion of NATO right against the face of Russia is another. Both are provocative and risky. ”
   http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2014/09/29/the-us-conquest-of-europe/

   Let’s Have Some Honesty and Realism at the NATO Conference
   As Mearsheimer points out, Russia was provoked, (as many had warned, for nearly 20 years, that it would be). After the demise of the Soviet empire and Warsaw Pact, the Russian leadership did not object to NATO’s continued existence, he writes. In fact, the Russians counted on NATO to restrain Germany. But they ”did not want NATO to grow any larger and assumed that Western diplomats understood their concerns.
   http://reason.com/archives/2014/09/04/lets-have-some-honesty-and-realism-at-th

   —–

   Hur blir en fd ung socialist rabiat krigshetsare och NATO språkrör i den största ”vänster” dagstidningen i Sverige?